id be a fan of every time it flies over a unit, starting at least 3 inches away and ending at least 3 inches away from its target unit (to avoid mortals on a unit you are falling back from) roll for every Terradon model roll a die, on 6+ mortal wound, +1 to roll if there are 4-6 terradons, +2 for more than 6.
I used thehonestwargamer and i could say it is a good resource
I'm not saying your resources are bad (or at least I wasn't, I'l come back to that in a moment
), I'm saying winrate itself is a fairly meaningless statistic as winrate does not correspond to stuff being overpowered/underpowered/balanced in the slightest. Far too many things factor into winrate beyond the question of balance. Something as stupid as "the counter-strategy just isn't popular cuz it's boring" can already result in massivly inflated winrates. And similarly 1 faction being overrepresented can lower it's winrates to roughly a "balanced" 50% as it'l end up fighting itself more often (thus gaining both a loss and a win for the statistics).
Value for money seems like a good place to start with a new army if you're getting your feet wet in the game.
meh, given the sample list I'm guessing the biggest change is that revenants are getting to become a hell of a lot better. But beyond that it's mostly just smaller tweaks that shouldn't completly overhaul the meta.
You are right with the Phoenix temple but i dont only see the winrates i see the top 3, how many games win seraphon, how many players play with seraphon (and other armies) and you could see that we are bad. Against new factions or more and less updated battletomes we aren't good, you cant say we are a competitive or top army. Our only good strategy is spamming skinks and stealing points...so sadI'm not saying your resources are bad (or at least I wasn't, I'l come back to that in a moment
Just look at some of the weird winrates in the list from thehonestwargamer, there's several currently completly unsupported armies in there that apparently achieved a "balanced" 50% winrate, and the 2nd highest winrate is for Phoenix temple only 1% behind the number 1 faction (DoK). So a faction with 4 models, no allegiance rules, no artifacts etc., no battletome, containing only melee troops and having no wizards is somehow the 2nd best when judged according to the winrate according to thehonestwargamer. Either the few things they do have are increadibly overpowered, or it just so happens that the 3 players playing Phoenix temple (out of a total of 1399 different players) happenend to be good and/or Lucky....
Also, coming back to the resources being good, the actual source is flawed, it's only looking a the relativly high level tournaments. Which 1) introduces a massive selection-bias as you have a relativly skilled playerbase that abuses every advantage they can get their hands on and 2) introduces statistical problems as the sample size is far too small for quite a lot of armies (see aformentioned 3 Phoenix temple armies..)
Sotek isn't very present currently, right now it's either Kroak or dracothion? the big space dragon thing that healed sigmar, if I remember correctly we're the only race to have any real connection with him by hanging out with him among the stars.
