Slann
Imrahil
Thirtheenth Spawning
- Messages
- 14,637
- Likes Received
- 28,191
- Trophy Points
- 113
Let's dream about it!
A flying magical lizard of death, a centerpiece valued (and worth) 400-500 points
And priced about 250 euros
Grrr, !mrahil
Let's dream about it!
A flying magical lizard of death, a centerpiece valued (and worth) 400-500 points
And priced about 250 euros
Grrr, !mrahil
Homebrew is a thing
No, how could you POSSIBLY use some rules thrown together by someone that ISN'T James Workshop! It's safer to simply never use the flipping awesome minis in any version of the game where they're not ordained by the creators. The Tabletop Gaming Police don't let this sort of thing slide!
THE PLAN SHOWS IT'S NEW DIRECTRICES
SLANN IS ABSOLUTELY COSTUMISABLE!!!!
OVIRAPTOR CAVALRY!!!!
NEW WARRIORS!!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
At least the vampire box comes with some neat terrain, the bamboo pallisades are neat.It looks as if GW can't release anything cool without dropping some Daughters of Khaine, Vampires and Primaris Marines along with it.
At least the vampire box comes with some neat terrain, the bamboo pallisades are neat.
Shame of the weird trees wit hands they come attached too though.
Eighth Edition for Life!Well yes, but older editions...
Oldhammer still remains a classic!
Wouldn't that be nice. I'd be shocked if that was the case though.It almost looks like you could build two completely different Slann models from one kit?
So you make one sitting on the paladin and you use the other on a Stegadon.
I've made custom rules, but only for fun, I've never fielded it.
More or less than the "current" sculpt?I'm really not hugely fond of these Saurus to be honest
I agree about the shields. They're my least favourite part of the new sculpt.The shields are also too AoS-ified, give me back the old scaled shields when Lizardmen were Lizardmen
It took me just a moment to figure this out. Ya did me dirty. I posted the Seraphon pictures clipped straight from the live feed as it was being presented in real time. Today I go through the thread only to find that you posted yours "first"... but only by going back retroactively and editing an earlier post. Makes it look like I double posted you, when the reverse is true.THE PLAN SHOWS IT'S NEW DIRECTRICES
SLANN IS ABSOLUTELY COSTUMISABLE!!!!
OVIRAPTOR CAVALRY!!!!
NEW WARRIORS!!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Justice (petty revenge) has been served.It took me just a moment to figure this out. Ya did me dirty. I posted the Seraphon pictures clipped straight from the live feed as it was being presented in real time. Today I go through the thread only to find that you posted yours "first"... but only by going back retroactively and editing an earlier post. Makes it look like I double posted you, when the reverse is true.
Dirty. Two can play at that game though (even if only out of principle).
It almost looks like you could build two completely different Slann models from one kit?
So you make one sitting on the paladin and you use the other on a Stegadon.
(Well we are talking about GW so it will probably not be possible to make two complete ones, but it looks close to it)
Wouldn't that be nice. I'd be shocked if that was the case though.
I've made custom rules, but only for fun, I've never fielded them.
More or less than the "current" sculpt?
Justice (petty revenge) has been served.
Games Workshop would certainly have no issue with you using custom rules... as long as you buy MORE minis from them!!No, how could you POSSIBLY use some rules thrown together by someone that ISN'T James Workshop! It's safer to simply never use the flipping awesome minis in any version of the game where they're not ordained by the creators. The Tabletop Gaming Police don't let this sort of thing slide!
I also hate we don't have clubs & spears options. Others have said they saw spears. I think that's just the standard bearer.
Justice (petty revenge) has been served.
Hahaha
GOOD EYES. I missed that. Hmm... you think GW would have shown that in this release.I thought that too until I saw this shot:
The one on the right is the Standard Bearer, so the one on the left must be carrying a spear.
Nice catch!The one on the right is the Standard Bearer, so the one on the left must be carrying a spear.
I personally don't have an issue with bias. Even if I were to be forced to write a Vampire Counts book (shudder), I'd still try and make it a nice, balanced, thematic book that is neither underpowered or overpowered, because I know that that is exactly what I would want if I were a Vampire player. I think about what my target audience would want whenever I write a list, and try to deliver on that (unlike GW who think only how much money they can make, which isn't fully linear with what everyone wants). Of course even with the best will in the world I've still found some of my work to be a bit strong when sharing it with one of the lads on EEFL, who has been great at reviewing it for me, but since then I have been going over it and tweaking it until it has been a lot better. That's what real testing is all about.From my vantage point, here are the issues:
- bias leading to imbalance (more so than the usual GW imbalance)
There lies the importance of advertising. I must admit I perhaps should join more forums and advertise mine. Fortunately Matthias Eliasson, the previous king of Fantasy fan-made rules, has become too obsessed with his own 9th Edition to care about 8th anymore, so there's a chance for me to usurp his throne. Additionally, wherever possible I've left armies to use 'official' 8th works, my main objective is writing rules for new armies and bumping up those on the weak side, relying on existing 8th sources wherever possible. In other words, the minimum to keep 8th alive and fun for everybody.
- splintering of an already small player pool (everyone playing different sets of rules)
Simple, let them have a read of the book in advance of the game, so they have an idea of what they're up against before you play. That also gives them a chance to raise any concerns over balance in which case that's more opportunity to tweak things slightly to get it right.
- unfamiliarity for the opponent
I would never advocate that others refrain from implementing their own custom rules, but it just isn't really for me. I've made custom rules for custom characters in the past (and feel they are rather good), but I've never actually fielded it. Tastes will vary though. As long as all parties involved agree, by all means go for it. Enjoy your hobby as you see fit.
o definitly waiting, not buying it just for the terrain. Just saying it's somethingMight as well wait until GW releases the scenery separately, as they have done here:
https://www.games-workshop.com/en-GB/ravaged-lands-gnarlwood-watchcamp-2022
I like that scenery, mind you, it would fit quite well as Lizardman-themed scenery, especially the pieces with actual ruined Lizardman stonework.
The main issue with bias in fanmade projects isthat a lot of it is subconcious and it can be reaaaaally hard to detect and stop if there's only 1 or 2 writers. Which usually results in the authors favorite simply being more fleshed out, be just a little bit more thematicly coherent etc. Even if it isn't necesarly OP, it'll probably be noticeable when you only have 1 or 2 writers for an entire project.I personally don't have an issue with bias. Even if I were to be forced to write a Vampire Counts book (shudder), I'd still try and make it a nice, balanced, thematic book that is neither underpowered or overpowered, because I know that that is exactly what I would want if I were a Vampire player. I think about what my target audience would want whenever I write a list, and try to deliver on that.