Slann
NIGHTBRINGER
Second Spawning
- Messages
- 90,145
- Likes Received
- 277,821
- Trophy Points
- 113
Nice picture
As I am not familiar with the Chaos Dwarf lore and fluff: What exactly(or sort of) is a K'daai Destroyer?
Gr, Imrahil
They are gigantic deamon-bound fire constructs created by the Chaos Dwarfs. In the game of WFB 8th edition they are extremely potent monsters on the battlefield.As I am not familiar with the Chaos Dwarf lore and fluff: What exactly(or sort of) is a K'daai Destroyer?


It's official artwork that can be found in the Monstrous ArcanumWhere'd you find that pic? Is that an official GW artwork or a fan piece?
Thank you!@NIGHTBRINGER
if you need one, i saw this on Ebay and thought of you.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Warhammer-...B-/293459141538?&_trksid=p2056016.m2516.l5255
to be honest it's dissapointing we got fyreslayers instead of the chaos dwarfs. Both are heavily fire/magma themed, but at least the chaos dwarfs are more than an overgrown cult and actually form a functional society. And they'd fit in fairly well into AoS, just say that they're dwarfs who survived during Sigmar's abscence by using their daemon engines to keep the hordes of chaos at bay. Which could make them both an order & a chaos faction depending on how far you'd like the corruption to go. If nothing else they should've combined the two, it'd give the fyreslayers some much needed variation and depth.
I'd say it would be wave 3 given that they already have a 2nd tome. But sure they can always add something neat, though I'm not sure what could be added that actually fits with slayers.Let's just wait and see if GW give Fyreslayers a Wave 2, hmm? There's still potential for this to be done at some point in the next couple of years.
I'd say it would be wave 3 given that they already have a 2nd tome. But sure they can always add something neat, though I'm not sure what could be added that actually fits with slayers.
Fun, but doesn't exactly fit in with fyreslayers without significantly altering or expanding lore. Which imho is kind of the issue. GW have kind of painted themselves into a corner by making a minor cult into an entire civilisation. So new stuff can't deviate from the cult niche too much. And since they didn't give them much to begin with it's difficult to add anything onto it. Any new use of ur-gold would require a lot of explaining. At least the statues being avatars of their god makes it a relativly simple addition I guess.
- Animated statues of Grimnir - given that they already know how to awaken power stored in runes hammered into themselves, it wouldn't be much of a stretch for them to be able to do the same with stone statues.
Fits better in with their established lore, but doesn't add much. At least it could help flesh out magmadroths.
- A chariot drawn by young Magmadroths, and/or a hunting pack-style unit with baby Magmadroths being herded by Slayers dedicated to raising them - given that Magmadroths are an essential part of Fyreslayer culture and symbolism, why not develop that further?
How exactly would those be any different from their male counterparts though? Simply giving them a different axe doesn't add much if they're still just another variant of a berserker with orange hair and gold stamped into their bodies.
- Female Fyreslayer warriors - why not, given that some of the many children Runefathers have with their wives will inevitably be daughters?
Might be, who knows. In all honesty though, I'd rather see no more new factions for a while. We're nearly at 30, fleshing out the established ones seems more worthwhile.As for Chaos Dwarfs, perhaps GW could reinvent the lore behind the existing miniatures as the Fyreslayers' dark counterparts, given that there are lore confirmations of Fyreslayers becoming AoS Chaos Dwarfs?
That stegadon vs destroyer picture is great, where was that from??
to be honest it's dissapointing we got fyreslayers instead of the chaos dwarfs.
The Chaos Dwarfs don't like any of their former brethren!!! They'd rather scalp them than fight alongside of them.If nothing else they should've combined the two, it'd give the fyreslayers some much needed variation and depth.
The Chaos Dwarfs don't like any of their former brethren!!! They'd rather scalp them than fight alongside of them.
Who won first and second?Fyreslayers took 3rd at Cancon! My vote wins!!! Lmao jk jk. Was nice to see a list for them with a little bit more than Hearthguard Berserker spam.
Who won first and second?
I know, I mean they should've combined them into a spiritual succesor of both. Take the corruption, cruelty & warmachines from chaos dwarfs & combine that with the slayers cult as a civilization wide shame over falling to corruption so low. It could be an interesting combination. The corruption and shame being some nice points of interest to hinge their culture upon. And it would work quite well with how the fyreslayers survived the chaos onslaught as well as giving them a much more fleshed out background beyond "slayers, but somehow an entire civilization of them".
I mean that the slayers collectivly could have the "shame" of having being so corrupted by chaos/having fallen so low in order to survive under the dominion of chaos. It'd explain why the "shame" is civilization-wide, and not just that there's occasional individuals who happen to be shamed, and thus why the cult suddenly became civilization-wide, instead of just the occasional temple/lodge/whatever dedicated to the cult.The Chaos Dwarfs already have the "shame" aspect of slayers in the form of their Infernal Guard. The Infernal Guard are simply a more armored and crueler version of slayers.