I decided to go ham and try and make my images more accurate/useable.
View attachment 68926
Above is the standard 4by6 board,
- BLUE/RED: indicates deployment zones,
- WHITE: indicates middle ground lines and territory lines when applicable to the scenario
- GREEN: indicates objectives range of capture (with a 1" sq representing a potential marker), secondary rings indicate that the range of capture is different however this does not affect the minimum range we can place our terrain feature (6")
- ORANGE: indicates the distance from the table edge that we are allowed to place our terrain feature (6")
- PINK: indicates our terrain feature footprint.
Note: You will notice two grids in the background, I set it so the larger grid is 5" and the smaller grid is 1" this should help you when counting distances/calculating moves.
Below is the same image, however it is scaled correctly for a 3by4 board. Deployment zones, objectives & their control radius, territory restriction, and terrain piece distances have been scaled based on the ratio of 1.5. This was agreed on by my game group to help scale our games. the 1.5 was gathered by finding the ratio between our long table edge by a standard board (6/4 = 1.5 [prettier math & measurements this way] vs short, 4/3=1.333). Measurements were determined by "standard-measurement" / "ratio" (6/1.5=4 ie of foot-long edge, and objective control radius).
Note: This time I actually went through and made the measurements 100% accurate to eliminate guesswork and rounding errors)
View attachment 68927
To be updated on pg1 from pg7 (altered from pg6).
Edit: Gah I just noticed I missed the center objective on one of the standard images.... I'll make sure I correct it when I update the front page.