• The forum software have been upgraded to the latest version.

    If you notice anything that looks off, or does not work, please let us know.

    For more information, click here.

Tutorial Realmshaper Engine Guide.

RandomTsar said:
I would update my thread but it seems it is doomed. Not sure if you think my placement aid pictures are useful but feel free to use them here if you think they might help.
Click to expand...

your thread has been helpful (at least to me when i wrote my commentary in the seraphon tutorial).
And yeah, those pictures are handy.
 
The RSE is great defense against normal ranged shooting and melee. However, it is not that great against magic as it increases your size to be targeted and offers no defense against mortal wounds. Lucky for us, we have some of the strongest magic and can deal so much damage in the hero phase. As a result I think it is more of a liability for most armies to go into the RSE as if the opponent does jump in you can turn it into a microwave oven pumping celestial deliverance and endless spells into the RSE to fry anything stupid enough to go inside.

Endless spells are very nice with the RSE as theyhit everything inside. Slamming a pendulum into it when it has a hero and a unit in it can be devastating.

At the same time, most armies do not have our magical abilities and can not dish out the mortal wounds like we can so if we hope into the RSE we are probably better off than if we were not in it.
 
The effect of the RSE will also heavily vary depending on how you play. Usually we only play with 6 terrain pieces + whatever faction terrain, but I have seen battle reports (especially Miniwargaming) where there is almost more terrain than table.
 
Killer Angel said:
3rd edit (and i bet it won't be the last one):
IMO, the most (and probably the only) valid reasoning would be that:
1 - the above FAQ says "warscrolls are included for those instances when a spell or ability allows you to set up the terrain feature".
2 - If a terrain feature is fielded for a reason different than spells or abilitiies, the FAQ doesn't apply.
3 - the RE is not listed under "allegiance abilites", so the FAQ doesn't work in that case, and so the RE it's a part of the army, as written in the battletome.
4 - if all of the above reasoning is true, then the RE is, indeed, a part of your army. But in any case, this won't stop a seraphon opponent to use it: in all terrain warscrolls, "friendly unit" refers to the player who's actually controlling the objective.
Click to expand...

Realmshaper Engine is listed directly under the Allegiance ability section of our battletome between Artefacts of Power and Constellations. The rule text for the RSE says: "When you choose a Seraphon Army, you can include 1 Realmshaper Engine terrain feature..." Thus the RSE is set up due to an allegiance ability, which is an ability, and is not part of your army roster. Placing the RSE is definitely optional.
 
Almost finished with this tutorial. I still need to flesh out the placement section. Eventually I might expand the placement to link to each battleplan and discuss them all individually.

Are there any topics which you all feel I have missed? Also. are there sections where the topic was better covered so that I may use them as highwater marks to improve any lacking portions?
 
Would it be worth putting something about placing Arcane Ruins in the opposite deployment zone to the Realmshaper if the option is available to you, so your opponent has to pick between you getting the Realmshaper or +1 to cast etc?
 
ravagekitteh said:
Would it be worth putting something about placing Arcane Ruins in the opposite deployment zone to the Realmshaper if the option is available to you, so your opponent has to pick between you getting the Realmshaper or +1 to cast etc?
Click to expand...
Oh, I like it.

Placement is taking me awhile and shaping up to be a rather long section. It feels like I will need to write the section twice. Once for tournament play and once for LGS/friendly play.
 
ravagekitteh said:
I can’t claim credit for it - it was @Killer Angel who had the idea!
Click to expand...

To cite myself, I've thought of (basically) 3 options to place the RE


Realmshaper Engine - placement tips

not something you can optimize, but it’s useful to know how you can employ our terrain, given that the rules for its placement are awful.
first problematic rule: any Realmshaper Engine must be set before any other terrain features are set up, more than 6" from any objectives and more than 6" from the edge of the battlefield.
second problematic rule: you must garrison the terrain with a seraphon wizard or priest if you want to use its effect.
third problematic rule: the RE can be garrisoned also by enemy unit (Garrison rule: a unit can be set up as a garrison at the start of a battle if the terrain feature is wholly within the unit’s territory. Alternatively, a unit can garrison a terrain feature instead of making a normal move if all of its models are within 6" of the terrain feature, and there are no enemy models within 3" of the terrain feature or already garrisoning it. this also means that you cannot LoSaT into it)
fourth problematic rule (as per latest FAQ): a wizard on Balewind Vortex cannot stay in the RE, it’s removed from the garrison and placed at 1” from it.

Of course, the BIG problem is that, when you place the RE, you don’t know if it will end in your territory or in the opponent’s… with the latter option, not only you are not using it, but you are gifting your opponent a solid base that can be garrisoned and blocks your LoS. This sucks to the point that many players simply don’t bring the RE to the table, even if it comes for free in matched play.
However, there are some tricks that you can use to place your RE in a way that will let you gain advantages. Let’s see.

first option: if you play with the official scenery deployment rule for matched play printed in the GHB2019 (You really should), each player chooses a number of terrains (which are divided into primary and secondary ones). The terrains that got a warscroll have the abilities listed on the warscroll; pick Arcane Ruins as one of your primary terrain, as Arcane Ruins come with the arcane rule (+1 to cast and dispel)
Setup the RE and the Arcane Ruins on opposite deployment zones, forcing your opponent to let you garrison the Realmshape or to concede you a further +1 to cast / dispel. It’s a win-win.

second option:
It’s the simplest. The RE must be placed at more than 6" from obj, so it's useless to control them. Place it in a place where it gives no additional benefit at all (for example, units placed behind it to negate LoS won't control obj)… in this way, if it ends in the enemy territory, your opponent simply won't gain any kind of tangible benefit from it.
Basically: 50% good, 50% nothing happens.

third option:
Requires some planning. Place the RE in a useful place, that could be annoying for you if garrisoned by the opponent. If the RE doesn’t end in your territory, it will act as a bait… and you will make the enemy regret the choice of garrisoning it. You just need to have a list ready to exploit the trap.
Examples: that huge piece of terrain is a great target for spells as Aethervoid Pendulum and every spell that deal those sweet MWs that ignore the +1 to save granted by the garrison (think about Kroak and a triple celestial deliverance).
Or Place the terrain at the outer limit of a territory. If it ends in the enemy's, set up your terradons at the minimum distance from it (usually 24"), buff the terradons with something as priest and starpriest and drown the garrisoned unit with MWs.
 
@Killer Angel
Great analysis.
I think more often than not getting into the RSE will hurt the opponent more than it will help. We just have so much MWs that having a bigger base just helps us. Getting your opponents ranged units and heroes closer to your kroak means more celestial deliverance and more endless spells.

But even if you are worried that the opponent can take great advantage of the RSE, you should still deploy the RSE. As you said there is almost always a place you can put the RSE where it is of little value. 6" away from a unused board edge for example. But you should still have it on the table for the off chance that you might want to teleport a skink mage to use it for a few MWs. Having that option is worth putting it on the board in a useless position. It gives options which are always better to have.
 
Lambs and Lions said:
@Killer Angel
Great analysis.
I think more often than not getting into the RSE will hurt the opponent more than it will help. We just have so much MWs that having a bigger base just helps us. Getting your opponents ranged units and heroes closer to your kroak means more celestial deliverance and more endless spells.

But even if you are worried that the opponent can take great advantage of the RSE, you should still deploy the RSE. As you said there is almost always a place you can put the RSE where it is of little value. 6" away from a unused board edge for example. But you should still have it on the table for the off chance that you might want to teleport a skink mage to use it for a few MWs. Having that option is worth putting it on the board in a useless position. It gives options which are always better to have.
Click to expand...
My issue with not placing the RSE within a deployment zone is that it seems like a waste of time, at least if you want to use the MW ability. It simply takes way too long to deploy inside and use the ability.

You will use 1 turn to run/teleport a Wizard nearby. Next turn you will use the movement phase to deploy inside, but you have to wait yet another turn since the ability is used in your hero phase.

This means in the absolute best case, you wont be able to use it until turn 3, and also likely lose the support buffs from said Wizard (Im assuming a Skink hero) in at least 2 of the turns. Stuff will likely be outside of 18”, so its a 50/50 if you can zap a unit.

Whatever hero you put inside the RSE would likely have provided a better output by staying near your other dudes for buffs/command abilities.

Now if we are talking about blocking off a part of the board coupled with bound Endless spells, then we are talking imo. Otherwise I will always throw it in a deployment and hope for the 50/50.
 
Lambs and Lions said:
But you should still have it on the table for the off chance that you might want to teleport a skink mage to use it for a few MWs. Having that option is worth putting it on the board in a useless position. It gives options which are always better to have.
Click to expand...

You cannot directly teleport units into it, but other than that i agree.
 
Lambs and Lions said:
@Killer Angel
Great analysis.
I think more often than not getting into the RSE will hurt the opponent more than it will help. We just have so much MWs that having a bigger base just helps us. Getting your opponents ranged units and heroes closer to your kroak means more celestial deliverance and more endless spells.

But even if you are worried that the opponent can take great advantage of the RSE, you should still deploy the RSE. As you said there is almost always a place you can put the RSE where it is of little value. 6" away from a unused board edge for example. But you should still have it on the table for the off chance that you might want to teleport a skink mage to use it for a few MWs. Having that option is worth putting it on the board in a useless position. It gives options which are always better to have.
Click to expand...
we got a lot of MW, but we kinda suck at just nuking a single target into oblivion. Yeah, if there's a support hero & a unit or 2 of ranged units they'l quickly get decimated by AoE spells because each of them gets hit very easily now. But if it's simply 1 unit it won't really suffer from being in the RSE. It's easier to hit, but it also has a larger range itself, and it's now protected from regular attacks. Which is probably worth the tradeoff for most units, assuming they stay in range of whatever they need to hit of course.

Which Imho, is the main reason this tactic is probably not going to work very well in practise when your opponent has halfway decent ranged troops. A skilled opponent won't stick say 2 celestar Ballista's & a lord ordinator in there. He'l stick 1 ballista in there which has more than enough range to be usefull, and is all that's needed to deny you the RSE anyway.

Imho, unless your opponent has no (decent-ish) ranged troops then garisonning it will rarely be outright detrimental for your opponent unless he stuffs too many units in it (thus making Kroak's job too easy) or if he garissons it while nothing of value is nearby (e.g. no point in garissoning it while all the objectives are on the other side of the battlefield...). And if your opponent is willing to garisson an RSE in the middle of nowhere he's probably not very good anyway...
 
Canas said:
A skilled opponent won't stick say 2 celestar Ballista's & a lord ordinator in there. He'l stick 1 ballista in there which has more than enough range to be usefull, and is all that's needed to deny you the RSE anyway.
Click to expand...

But in this case we can just ignore that particular ballista and go for other forces. And, in my experience, single ballista doesn't do much with long range attack. I struggle to think about anything, except Nagash, which can really mess our game by garrisoning RSE. Must stuff either not that much important or needs to be mobile or have more than 20 wounds combined. If you are concerned about long range stuff - you can win some distance by placing RSE exactly 6" away from the edge. You will still benifit from it, but still screw your opponent, if they decide to garrison it.

Alternatively, placing it on the edge of the deployment zone will allow you to tie your opponent's long ranged units with fast stuff. It depends, when you go one or another, but after a couple of tests, I feel like we overestimated RSE's benifits for opponents on paper.

At least, I haven't heard any negative feedback regarding RSE and my own experience is fairly good. It's just annoying that all other faction terrain is simply "plug 'n' play" while we'll only be able to use ours half the time. But we didn't chose Seraphon, because it is an easy army to play, did we?
 
I'm probably in the minority but I really like the realmshaper engine rules (new AoS player, long time fan of Lizardmen from WFB days).
In general I dislike the faction terrain for one reason, if you buy the model your army is just better. No points cost, no downside, it's just flat out better.
This one is interesting and a great way to do faction terrain. It needs thought and can be a downside if poorly placed or unlucky, but is actually interactive with the enemy. They could use it, and need to change their game to take it into account. To me this makes good rules.
I didn't initially like the idea that our realmshaper could be garrisoned by the enemy, it didn't seem to feel right. But thinking about it there are many narrative reasons how and why they got in there and are now holding it against us. I have completely turned my thoughts round and love that now, and can use it to add story to my games.
 
JimInk said:
I'm probably in the minority but I really like the realmshaper engine rules (new AoS player, long time fan of Lizardmen from WFB days).
In general I dislike the faction terrain for one reason, if you buy the model your army is just better. No points cost, no downside, it's just flat out better.
This one is interesting and a great way to do faction terrain. It needs thought and can be a downside if poorly placed or unlucky, but is actually interactive with the enemy. They could use it, and need to change their game to take it into account. To me this makes good rules.
I didn't initially like the idea that our realmshaper could be garrisoned by the enemy, it didn't seem to feel right. But thinking about it there are many narrative reasons how and why they got in there and are now holding it against us. I have completely turned my thoughts round and love that now, and can use it to add story to my games.
Click to expand...
I am with you on this one. Hopefully other factions terrain will adopt similar rules. Would love to see all faction terrain setup up prior to other terrain in a future GHB.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top