SilverFaith said:
To be honest, I can kinda get behind the reason for doing it, though I think it's a stupid choice.
Slanns have been... difficult to balance. They are tough as nails, have inherent ward saves, and a whole slew of disciplines specifically designed to make them better casters. Their 8th edition rules are far weaker than their, frankly, overpowered rules back in 7th. They did a fairly good explanation for why they have grown weaker, but it only gets them so far - GW doesn't seem to like how Slanns currently are, being these super powerful, and difficult to kill, wizards. One could just say "Nerf them more, then", or whatever, but in all honesty, would you prefer:
1. Slanns getting removed
2. Slanns getting nerfed to the point of being literally just a standard level 4 wizard, with no ward save, T3, etc.
Sorry, but... Stop that bullshit.
1st - look at ANY championship list. How many lizardmen players there? Any any LM winners? None. Face the fact that there are some powerful armies in WH - Chaos, HE , DE, empire. 90% of victories in any championships are between them.
So, when u say about "slanns was too good " - it's just a lie. LM is one of the less powerful army in FB.
2nd - fluff of this Lustria devastation is just awful. Skavens was building something in secret and for hundreds of years? Skavens? Wow, they are pure chaotic, unpredictable and betrayal each other race. They can't do anything for a long time. So this Lustria devastation is just a "okay, let's kill Lizardmen race, and we don't want to think, and we don't care ".
So, in fact - GW simply removed LM in most crude way. And all that "I feel fine, I feel happy " on this forum looks pathetic to be honest.