• The forum software have been upgraded to the latest version.

    If you notice anything that looks off, or does not work, please let us know.

    For more information, click here.

8th Ed. KROAK and Burning ALignment in FAQ.

@Sleboda: Jusr because there's a new book without a FAQ, and a rule has almost the same wording as in the old book doesn't mean thay have changed the rule now. It only means the rule lacks the clarification that the old FAQ gave. The interpretation of the rule can still be the same, with or without a FAQ (in the instances when the rules are ambigous)
 
Can be, yes.
That's not my point, though. I'm saying that an official answer to a question about a book that is no longer around is not proper to apply to a different rule source.
 
Sleboda said:
Can be, yes.
That's not my point, though. I'm saying that an official answer to a question about a book that is no longer around is not proper to apply to a different rule source.
Click to expand...
I agree.

I just wonder how long we have to wait for an errata/faq. I have a whole list of things I want either answered (where the rules are unclear or there's a disagreement in the community)
1. Frenzy. Can you avoid the Ld-test if you voluntarily declare a charge aginst a target of your choice?
2. This question.
3. Don't give the model mw and ap from piranha blade other than with the cc attacks from that sword.


or changed (when the rules are clear, but stupid/I would like it to change)
1. Give us PF on supporting attacks!
2. Give chiefs ripper megafrenzy vs toaded unit.
3. Let mounted chiefs join the same kind of unit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top