• The forum software have been upgraded to the latest version.

    If you notice anything that looks off, or does not work, please let us know.

    For more information, click here.

Just for laughs...

NIGHTBRINGER said:
The two things I dislike the most about the Hobbit are:
  1. It's too long. LOTR needed to be long because of the three books it was adapted from. As such, with LOTR we got lots of quality content. The Hobbit novel just isn't long to justify 3 entire films. It's too spread out and overloaded with filler... almost as if it was stretched, like butter scarped over too much bread. ;)
  2. The goofy scenes. The sequence with the Goblin king underground, the barrel river run, Legolas running across stones that are already free falling, etc.
The Smaug scenes, voice and CGI were pretty cool though.
Click to expand...

Okay, I def agree that it is too long. They could have knocked it down into one movie easily, or two shorter ones.

As for the goofy stuff, the Legolas stuff was unnecessary (clearly they included him to attract female viewers), the Goblin King stuff was overdone, but I liked a lot of the barrel stuff. Mind you, they could have made that a LOT shorter...
 
Tk'ya'pyk said:
Okay, I def agree that it is too long. They could have knocked it down into one movie easily, or two shorter ones.

As for the goofy stuff, the Legolas stuff was unnecessary (clearly they included him to attract female viewers), the Goblin King stuff was overdone, but I liked a lot of the barrel stuff. Mind you, they could have made that a LOT shorter...
Click to expand...
Fair enough.

So on a scale of "0" to "10", where 0 is the Rings of Power and 10 is the LOTR movie trilogy, what number would you assign to the Hobbit trilogy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top