Slann
NIGHTBRINGER
Second Spawning
- Messages
- 90,148
- Likes Received
- 277,836
- Trophy Points
- 113
Because a round number is not random enough?I really feel that we should not be celebrating round numbers for the random thread of random randomness.
Because a round number is not random enough?
No, because obviously this number isn't randomly chosen, it's a common milestone to celebrate. Clearly you should've rolled a large number of dice to determine which number of posts you would celebrate ahead of time. This could of course be a 100K, but in that case it would've been randomly established instead of post-hoc deciding that this specific milestone is worth celebrating.Because a round number is not random enough?
No, because obviously this number isn't randomly chosen, it's a common milestone to celebrate. Clearly you should've rolled a large number of dice to determine which number of posts you would celebrate ahead of time. This could of course be a 100K, but in that case it would've been randomly established instead of post-hoc deciding that this specific milestone is worth celebrating.
There are of course other ways to determine when to celebrate, but it should be done randomly not because it's a common milestone.
You can't prove I didn't I write it by randomly generating UTF-8 characters until a grammaticly correct post appeared and this was the first succesYour post takes the theme, gives a very sensible take on what the system hould be and lays it out logically.
Thus it violates the premise of the randomity
()
You can't prove I didn't I wrote it by randomly generating UTF-8 characters until a grammaticly correct post appeared and this was the first succes![]()
Indeed... and by that same token, perhaps I followed this procedure....You can't prove I didn't I write it by randomly generating UTF-8 characters until a grammaticly correct post appeared and this was the first succes![]()
Clearly you should've rolled a large number of dice to determine which number of posts you would celebrate ahead of time. This could of course be a 100K, but in that case it would've been randomly established instead of post-hoc deciding that this specific milestone is worth celebrating.
You should've shown your workings though, or at least establish it beforehand (and yes, so should I before you point that outIndeed... and by that same token, perhaps I followed this procedure....
That was precisely what I was going to do!(and yes, so should I before you point that out)


The age of the three Tomb Kings cannot be denied. We are inevitable.Let's dig up some threads by @Warden to counter these current affairs.
View attachment 93224
Of the 9,805 total members of this forum, only 3 have ever achieved a higher like count than @Lizards of Renown , who has just surpassed the legendary @Warden to take the 4th place position on the Most Likes list.
View attachment 93225
Congrats @Lizards of Renown View attachment 93226 We now patiently await for you to move up one more place and complete the trinity of the three Tomb Kings!
The age of the three Tomb Kings cannot be denied. We are inevitable.
Thanks!
I think I've been infected with the posting bug...
And eternal.