Ripperdactyl
bOdziO Wolf
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 490
- Likes Received
- 1,384
- Trophy Points
- 93
For me it is the other way round.Honestly, the only meh part about it is Teclis himself. The Sphinx looks great.
In fairness, not a high bar to pass.Still way better as the Bonereapers Mortarch.
barding is questionable because they are greek themed. the ancient world, especially the greeks, did not really use barding. Some decorative furniture? sure. Full barding was used later in period by the parthians, persians, and anyone else who could afford cataphracts.What are hammer pants?
Do those have another name I might recognize?
Why is barding on horses at all questionable?
Silver helms had barding, I thought.
I do want to know if the Sphinx can be had without a figure (Teclis? I presume) attached to her wing. Also, is he held to the wing by the cloak?![]()
Cataphracts were already in use by the persians/assyrians/whatever was in power in that corner of the world from quite early on. The earliest depictions of them in art are from the 13th century BC according to wikipedia. Even if the greeks needed some time to catch on. Though in fairness, the greeks didn't use much cavalry in general, so of course they didn't invest the necesary time & resources to get heavy armoured cavalry.barding is questionable because they are greek themed. the ancient world, especially the greeks, did not really use barding. Some decorative furniture? sure. Full barding was used later in period by the parthians, persians, and anyone else who could afford cataphracts.
Right, hence it being acceptable as a spiritual successor to high elves, but also meh.Cataphracts were already in use by the persians/assyrians/whatever was in power in that corner of the world from quite early on. The earliest depictions of them in art are from the 13th century BC according to wikipedia. Even if the greeks needed some time to catch on. Though in fairness, the greeks didn't use much cavalry in general, so of course they didn't invest the necesary time & resources to get heavy armoured cavalry.
So meh, I could imagine the greeks using barding like this had they actually developed proper cavalry on their own. And since we're already imagining the greeks are now elves who fight side by side with their creator who has a weird sphinx thing for a pet, armoured cavalry isn't much of a stretch anymore![]()
The ridiculous naming combined with the eh, "unique" designs at times so stuff is easier to copyright can be a bit weird yeah. Ossiarchs are a prime example, but here too, some of it is a tad overdone. In the case of the aelves they could've done with slightly less extreme of a helmet plume, especially for the regular spearmen (especially their captain is more plume than aelve...).Right, hence it being acceptable as a spiritual successor to high elves, but also meh.
I also am put off by GWs ridiculous naming habits for armies.
Can't see it for some reason.

Chris Peach said:Making them [the tiny books on the bookshelf] is as easy as grabbing some cardboard, then wrapping it in paper with some glue! “I looked into real-life bookbinding techniques to make them”, says Peachy. To speed things up, he made long strips which could be cut into several books, before painting them with symbols and titles to tie them to his coven. Elsewhere, Peachy used paper to make banners and even printed out some simple rugs, creating some great scatter scenery that really brings the board to life.


GW doesn't put many "make terrain from scratch" tutorials anymore; makes sense because why build your own terrain from cardboard when you can buy plastic terrain?
...that being said, I noticed this gem tucked inside an article today:
View attachment 66626
View attachment 66627
View attachment 66628