Lawot said:
They might alienate their older players, but that only matters (financially) if the older players spend more money on the hobby than new players.
Where this strategy will fail (and this is my personal prediction from my observations)
is the implication that there per definition will be "new players".
GW dont advertise
GW dont make marketing research
(these are their own proud words).
My observation is that the only channel to new customers, at least here in Denmark, is their existing consumer base.
I got in the hobby from friends, and a vast majority of our environment has been hooked up by someone in the
community. "Come try this out, we have tons of fun" was what got me in.
What happens when "Come try this" becomes
"GW dont care about their fanbase, I just squatted multiple collections of miniatures Ive bought across 10+ years. Ive moved over to this game, come try it out, we have lots of fun."
Lawot said:
I haven't bought anything from GW in years. Why should they worry what I think?
Thats actually quite simple:
If there is demand on their product that reaches second or thirdhand buyers, it means their product is more worth.
What is easier to sell?
A Saurus miniature that has value for the initial buyer
or
A Saurus miniature that has value for the initial buyer, which he knows is enough worth for him to sell it on.
I'd choose the second, as that would mean the initial buyer would be more inclined to buy from me, as he would be able to sell my product again when he got tired of it.
It would also mean that he is more inclined to buy something new from me.
When you buy something used on ebay you aren't denying them a sale of a Saurus Miniature,
you are boosting the brand and demand of the product and enables the initial buyer to buy more.
Lawot said:
I wish they'd keep the game closer to the tradition, but I know that they've got a business to run, and I can't blame them for drastically changing things, even if that's a bummer for me.
Agreed. What hurts me is that it doesn't seem like the strategy will change anything at all, but rather make things worse.
My feeling is that they destroy what we love to gain something that wont come to them.
It leaves both them and us with less.
Lawot said:
But anyways, I'll probably keep playing 8th, too. Even without new rules and models, my friends and I have plenty of untested possibilities for destroying each other.
I think you underestimate the value of new input.
Lizardmen meta doesn't only change when Lizardmen gets a new book,
It changes everytime a new unit sees the table, as you will have to come up with new methods and lists.
While 8th CAN live a LONG time after this without support (it already did)
It will eventual reach still water, and then you will either stop or move on to 9th.
sorry if I come of as out to get you, I really just had another view.
I totally get where you are coming from.