Saurus
Paul1748
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 67
- Likes Received
- 378
- Trophy Points
- 53
@Lizards of Renown great reviews. Will you make a review for your own piece ? I like your story the most. I would like to know your own thoughts on it.
@Lizards of Renown great reviews. Will you make a review for your own piece ? I like your story the most. I would like to know your own thoughts on it.
@Killer Angel
You've unleashed something here... I'm not a little bit obsessed with finishing the reviews, but I have to sleep now.
Firstly the idea that working hard at something will make you good at something. You can improve on what you do in a linear progression.
2nd that Ppl in general will appreciate something done properly vs just saying they like what everybody else says they like.
3rd that at some point, someone will be rewarded or recognised for levelling up enough.
I don’t believe any of those things.
But this is how the world works.
1. practice makes you better at anything. That's why we have rookies and experts. There's really no point in arguing that… unless you're Mary Sue, than you are already perfect.
2. people appreciate something done properly. Sure, especially in the field of arts many will side with the majority, but even there, as a general rule of thumb, the thing must be done right for the point it tries to make.
3. yes, sometime recognition go to people that don't deserve it, but again, as a rule of thumb, skilled people are rewarded for their skills.
The question must now become, who will review these reviews? For instance was the reviewer fair in his review or did he expose his own prejudices and bias? who is best reviewer?
just have fun and don’t take it to seriously. Ppl do their best, when they are not worried about what other ppl think.
Truth is, all of you in this contest have far more talent, then the author of 50 shades of grey. So hey, when you get your big publishing cheque, remember to send me some money.
As I stressed through my reviews, it is obviously my opinion and a survey of one. I'm not really interested in "being right". I didn't initially want to do any reviews as I HATE peoples creative impulses being squashed in any way. When @Killer Angel nudged me on the reviews, I had to think about my purpose in doing it. If my viewpoint and opinion helps the blossoming writers, then it is valuable. If it does not, then it's worthless honestly. (Until I become a international bestseller... If that happens, you guys better watch my masterclass)
This is a highly sensible idea.
I'll keep this in mind.![]()
Practice can make someone better, but can also make them worse as well.
Practice is not simply repetition. It is the mindful development of a Skill. Generally if you are taking a step back to take further steps forward then it due to adding in a new skill to the mix which is previously undeveloped.
If you are investing time purposefully and mindfully into the development of a skill set, so long as you have a good sense of the desired outcome, you should make headway towards reaching that goal.
Basically, if you are producing repetition without learning then I would say you aren't practicing.
Practice is not simply repetition. It is the mindful development of a Skill. Generally if you are taking a step back to take further steps forward then it is due to adding in a new skill to the mix which is previously undeveloped.
If you are investing time purposefully and mindfully into the development of a skill set, so long as you have a good sense of the desired outcome, you should make headway towards reaching that goal.
Basically, if you are producing repetition without learning then I would say you aren't practicing.
That is not true. Practice helps with both technique and expression. You can practice specifically for expression vs technique. This is especially true in arts/humanities such as literature, poetry, traditional medium art, music, acting, ect. The same way that a more practiced and studied philosopher can learn to develop more nuanced threads of thought.Practise can make someone technically more capable, but it won’t make their subjective output anymore interesting.
also technical perfection can seem even more boring if everybody else can do it as well.
To say that if someone is talented they don’t need much skill, because it will mostly be their perspective that other ppl find interesting.