• The forum software have been upgraded to the latest version.

    If you notice anything that looks off, or does not work, please let us know.

    For more information, click here.

The never-ending battle against woke Hollywood and SJW infused entertainment media [trigger warning]

Watch Gravity Falls. It's a complete series in 40 episodes and it has two things I know you like, lots of meme-able lines and an all powerful chaotic quipping villain.
I'm currently re-watching Castlevania (again)! :D Mind you, it is one of the newer shows that I gave a chance to.
 
I myself am working on spiritual successor to Tolkien (admittedly that is a more crowded market than Star Wars spiritual successors).

I doubt Scarterra will be seen as the spiritual successor to Tolkien, as Tolkien actually set a limit on the amount of stuff he fitted into his world ;)

Escalonia is more of a spiritual successor to Tolkien given how much inspiration I've taken from real-world ancient history and mythology for it, as well as Warhammer Fantasy and hints of Redwall. Not to mention that I've kept a control on the races and nations I want in my world.

Scarterra is more a spiritual successor to D&D and all the other 80s RPG mythes out there, as it shares their everything-but-the-kitchen-sink approach. But then, given how Wizards of the Coast is sending D&D down the pan, it's definitely in need of a spiritual successor, so Scarterra will certainly be well-received as the next RPG sensation. I vote you keep on focusing on achieving this niche.

I fear the man in this video completely misunderstands how the alpha/beta thing breaks down.

Essentially this breaks down to mating strategy and doesn't really involve politics. These distinctions were created by men who wanted to get laid more.

Alphas are men who seek to attract mates by showcasing their physical superiority or faking physical superiority with bravado.

Betas are men who seek to attract mates by showcasing their ability as a resource provider or faking their ability as a resource provider by taking out debt to buy fancy clothes and cars they cannot afford.

Sigmas combine the best of both traits alphas and betas, but are way better dude bro. You can be a sigma male if you buy my series of videos for $499.99 and subscribe to my newsletter for $49.99/month!

Omega males are males that lack the ability to showcase their physicality like an alpha and don't have the financial power of a beta, but no one is stuck as an Omega, since every Omega male has a Sigma male waiting to come out, dude bro. You can be a sigma male if you buy my series of videos for $499.99 and subscribe to my newsletter for $49.99/month!

A gamma male is a man that tries to attract mates by being romantic and sensitive. But due bro, you really should be a sigma male. You can be a sigma male if you buy my series of videos for $499.99 and subscribe to my newsletter for $49.99/month!

A delta male is an average male (or even above average) leading a balanced life that probably still has trouble attracting women. But dude bro, Deltas can easily transform themselves into sigmas. You can be a sigma male if you buy my series of videos for $499.99 and subscribe to my newsletter for $49.99/month!

A few places have talked about Zeta males. A Zeta male is married to their job or married to their hobby. Often an example is the Wright Brothers who were lifelong bachelors. Wilbur write said he could have a wife or an airplane, not both. But dude bro, Sigmas can have a wife and an airplane. You can be a sigma male if you buy my series of videos for $499.99 and subscribe to my newsletter for $49.99/month!

I actually never heard of delta or gamma males until I saw the video that PP posted, so I googled the terms and the articles I found describing them actually linked to an advertisement for a sigma male program, just as I predicted.

Anyway the Youtube video above has the following premise.

1-The alpha/beta/sigma nomenclature is a full of crap. True

2-The people who use the terms alpha, beta, and sigma tend to be on the Right side of the political spectrum. Half True, but only because lonely Leftists that have trouble getting laid use a different mating strategy than lonely Rightwingers.

3-By virtue of two wrongs make a right, this means that Right wingers should not criticize the Left artificially creating social construct genders. False.

I will point out that most men on the Right who happen to be married, often like to say that the alpha/beta categorization system is full of crap.

Anyway, based on his premise, he uses some faulty logic to come to conclusion that the Right invented a stupid arbitrary system of divisions for gender roles therefore those on the Right have no basis for criticizing the arbitrary system of divisions for gender roles created by Leftists.

Just like I'm against Communism and Fascism, I am against dumb ideas from the Left and I am against dumb ideas from the Right.

In my opinion, it just so happens that right now, in the United States, the neo-Marxists and idiot Leftists happen to have more political power and media influence than the neo-Fascists and idiot Right wingers.

If the pendulum swings too far the other direction, I will switch sides because I do not want either side of the political aisle to win. I want both political parties to check the worst impulses of the other party while they reluctantly hash out common sense legislation across the political aisle.

thanos-perfectly-balanced.gif


Also, the CCP is the greatest threat to the environment, basic human rights and the liberal world order, but the CCP isn't actively ruining Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Willow, Tomb Raider, the Muppets, LOTR, D&D, He-Man, the Witcher, DC, Marvel, and Scooby Doo. Woke politics and Borg like corporations are ruining these things.

EDIT: I suppose there is something called the horseshoe theory that states that at a certain point Far Right governments and Far Left governments start to resemble each other. I would argue that Putin is a Far Right dictator and Winnie the Pooh is a Far Left dictator but they both manufacture oppression and aggression.

Putin is a serious threat to Eastern Europe and the CCP is a serious threat to the entire world.

I agree with some of what you say, but I think these concepts get convoluted way too much...

Best way to understand it, for me at least:

Beta male -> weak male
Alpha male -> strong male

When you see it for what it is, at a fundamental level, you would never consider alpha someone who is pretending to be strong in order to impress someone, but instead an alpha is someone who, because he is strong he follows his own path and doesn't go around it in order to appease other people's ego.

I dont understand this as a physical thing either...
In the gym for example you can be muscular and in amazing shape and still be a weak male looking for female validation. Or not. You can be strong and train like crazy and simply focus on the grind and enjoying it for what it is. That's strength.

A beta male flag is also when a male is emotional instead of logical. When he is controlled by thoughts and feelings instead of being controlled by doing what's right.

Anyway, just my 2c

I agree more with @BigDinosaur - a truly strong, alpha male is someone who respects and supports both himself and others, chooses his own path, and always does his best to achieve his desired goals. Then there are two types of beta male - the overly-giving one lacking in self-respect that allows himself to be pushed around, and the self-centred bad boy bully that preys on those weaker than himself, preferably with a gang of lesser thugs around him, and loses his nerve when challenged by someone who can actually match him. Those are the only three real categories of men around.

And as @BigDinosaur also said, it's not about having outer strength, it's all about inner strength. Indeed I would advocate that men learn to develop their inner strength first, before building up their outer strength, because there are plenty of weak men out there who use muscle for evil.


@Scalenex, you keep tapping into this evolutionary psychology nonsense and mindsets like this won't do anything to help get humanity out of its current mess. Indeed I believe it's attitudes like this that brought about this mess in the first place - the more people believe trash like this, the less they will trust in their higher intelligence and conscience, and the more they will think that it's acceptable to just follow instinct like pathetic, primitive cavepeople, and play the victim and blame 'male/female/human nature' when things go wrong. The reason why I dislike Jordan Peterson is because he is an advocate of such attitudes who has forgotten that we can be so much more than mere animals, if we only put our minds to bettering ourselves mentally.

Everyone is responsible for their own actions all the time, and anyone who allows themselves to succumb to depraved instincts when they should not only has themselves to blame. Science only teaches us how the world is composed, not how we should live in it, and is no replacement for religion when it comes to teaching morality. As more and more people abandon religion, they need to be taught to live conscientiously and intelligently in alternative ways. Society needs to bring back the rules of morality and intelligent future preparation, specifically in school education, to stamp out this weak mindset that results in trusting only in what is and isn't according to science, and not what should be according to laws of decency and respectability. If people want freedom, then they should be taught to use it responsibly and not abuse it in the way that many are currently doing.

In particular hookup culture must be vilified as the hedonistic and depraved philosophy of a degeneration that pretends to be a 'revolution', because that is exactly what it is. It is the root of society's decline, and people must be taught how wrong it is to indulge in it.
 
Last edited:


7afhl6.jpg


galactic-republic-execute-order66.gif



Er, as far as I know, Luke seemed to enjoy kissing the woman he later found out to be his sister. A gayboy wouldn't.

Your-argument-is-invalid.jpg


Interesting stuff in this one. Definitely hope that some of it pans out.


I liked hearing how Disney+ lost a load of money. Between this and Netflix losing subscribers, I hope this is the start of the gradual decline of streaming services and the return of DVDs and Blu-Rays, cinema visits and general normality.

This Nelson Peltz sounds like the typical greedy little weasel-shit of a Ferengi that passes for a 'prominent' society figure these days, but if he wishes to return Disney to being politically neutral and focus on making good content (even if only because it fills his pockets more), then he's the lesser of two evils and I hope he succeeds.
 
Between this and Netflix losing subscribers, I hope this is the start of the gradual decline of streaming services and the return of DVDs and Blu-Rays, cinema visits and general normality.
I can't see physical media pushing back the clock and erasing/replacing streaming. Streaming offers too much convenience and bang for your buck.

The problem with streaming is the oversaturation of the market (too many companies vying for the same dollar) and insistence of these companies on producing woke content that just doesn't sell. If you put that woke content on DVD/Blu-ray, it would sell even less. Virtually nobody is going to lay down $50-80 for a season of She-Hulk on Blu-Ray.

As for DVDs specifically, they are outdated. Just like VHS before it.

This Nelson Peltz sounds like the typical greedy little weasel-shit of a Ferengi that passes for a 'prominent' society figure these days, but if he wishes to return Disney to being politically neutral and focus on making good content (even if only because it fills his pockets more), then he's the lesser of two evils and I hope he succeeds.
I think corporate greed is the only hope we've ever had. They will never do it out of the goodness of their heart or because it is the right thing to do.
 
@Scalenex, you keep tapping into this evolutionary psychology nonsense and mindsets like this won't do anything to help get humanity out of its current mess.

I hoped you understood I was trying to mock people who endorse "The Sigma Male Grindset".

In particular hookup culture must be vilified as the hedonistic and depraved philosophy of a degeneration that pretends to be a 'revolution', because that is exactly what it is. It is the root of society's decline, and people must be taught how wrong it is to indulge in it.

I don't like hookup culture either. I believe it is indirectly damaging society because families or at least should be the basis of society.

I often think of the serenity prayer.

God grant me the serenity To accept the things I cannot change; Courage to change the things I can; And wisdom to know the difference.

I believe hookup culture is one of the things I cannot change.

I believe the CCP and woke culture are two things I can help change, otherwise I wouldn't bother posting about them so much.

I can't see physical media pushing back the clock and erasing/replacing streaming.

Agreed, I'm not going to buy physical media for stuff I kind of like, but I buy physical media for stuff I really like because I don't want it edited into oblivion.

This Nelson Peltz sounds like the typical greedy little weasel-shit of a Ferengi that passes for a 'prominent' society figure these days, but if he wishes to return Disney to being politically neutral and focus on making good content (even if only because it fills his pockets more), then he's the lesser of two evils and I hope he succeeds.

At this point in my life, I have no problem with people doing the right thing for the wrong reasons. "I see, you want to make your own position better while making other people's position better. Awesome."

I have very little sympathy for people who do the wrong thing for the right reasons. "I see, you want people to suffer so you can feel good about your morality."
 
I have very little sympathy for people who do the wrong thing for the right reasons. "I see, you want people to suffer so you can feel good about your morality."

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."
 
I'd guess it's because normal people don't really care about this property, so they're less likely to engage with it and vote.

Indifference is worse than hatred. Arguably Velma is getting a second season because hate watchers pushed the viewing stats up.

Along those lines, Season 2 of the nasty Proud Family reboot doesn't even have enough critic reviews to warrant a score yet. The critics cannot bad mouth a woke show because they know what side of the bread their butter is on, but they cannot afford to completely alienate normies (as if they had any credibility left) so stuck in a lose-lose situation where they cannot afford to be praising or harsh on a piece of media, nowadays they don't post a review at all.
 
Okay, so here are a bunch of people who study Hollywood closely theorizing that Discovery/Warner Brothers is not trying to turn around their flailing ship away from Wokeism in order to become a major media player, they are doing so in order to prep franchises for sale to the highest bidder.

In this case the highest bidders would be Apple or Amazon two of the biggest CCP shills in the corporate world.

My cautious optimism for Harry Potter and DC is now replaced with cautious pessimism.
 
Back
Top