• The forum software have been upgraded to the latest version.

    If you notice anything that looks off, or does not work, please let us know.

    For more information, click here.

AoS NEW *rumor*

Christopher said:
What exactly are y'all talking about when you say "armor save." I checked the pinned abbreviations chart in this forum but it's not there. Is it just an older form of what's called a "save" in AoS? I came into the game right as 2.0 started and then drifted away just before the Endless Spells and the Necroquake and all that and am not familiar with that term.
Click to expand...

Yes and to differentiate it from a ward save, mortal wound save, etc.
 
Are MW from realmshaper considered as Magic or no ? I was thinking about the lumineth terrain feature and the anti Magic aura of Teclis
 
Erta Wanderer said:
saterday is when 3rd is dropping so maybe? not sure what more they have to say
Click to expand...

Lord Agragax of Lunaxoatl said:
I just find it strange that GW haven't said anything more about it, the only reason I knew about it in the first place was on Sunday's timetable for the coming week there it was on Saturday at 5:00. Normally they go wild when taking about previews.

It might be about the updated Stormcast and Orc Warclan tomes with accompanying models, but we'll see.
Click to expand...

Yep, GW have said it’s to celebrate Dominion arriving:
https://www.warhammer-community.com...editions-arrival-in-true-mortal-realms-style/

Most likely it’ll talk about the additional stuff coming for the two boxed game factions once Dominion arrives
 
PabloTho said:
What changed to make them rendable? Did the wording for how save rolls are made change in core rules?
Click to expand...
It was faq'd like a few months after the battletomb release about the 1+ you ignore the first rend so basically a rend 2 becomes rend 1 for it. You're asking the wrong guy about that behemoth I never use them. Also @Erta Wanderer answered it as well
 
Dread Saurian said:
It was faq'd like a few months after the battletomb release about the 1+ you ignore the first rend so basically a rend 2 becomes rend 1 for it. You're asking the wrong guy about that behemoth I never use them. Also @Erta Wanderer answered it as well
Click to expand...
If i remember correctly the FAQ a couple months after the 2.0 battletome said exactly the opposite, that the Bastiladon ignores all rend as long as it is on it's top profile. so maybe something changed with the new core rules, otherwise it is still working the same way
 
Dreamkeeper said:
Thx guys!
And if I'm correct, the rule of "-1 dmg for coalesced" is now applied to mortal wounds? Since the last the FAQ is ignored in the new one.
Click to expand...

Nope, the faq has been removed because it's covered by the core rules.
mortals wounds do damage on the target equal to the number of mortal wounds caused, basically 3 MWs inflict 3 separate damages
 
Killer Angel said:
Nope, the faq has been removed because it's covered by the core rules.
mortals wounds do damage on the target equal to the number of mortal wounds caused, basically 3 MWs inflict 3 separate damages
Click to expand...
aaah, I see! Thanks!
 
Killer Angel said:
Nope, the faq has been removed because it's covered by the core rules.
mortals wounds do damage on the target equal to the number of mortal wounds caused, basically 3 MWs inflict 3 separate damages
Click to expand...
I'm not sure if that's the case. The rules say the damage inflicted on the target is equal to the mortal wounds caused. I read that as something that inflicts d3 mortal wounds would be reduced by one since it is a single source
 
Tyranitar said:
I'm not sure if that's the case. The rules say the damage inflicted on the target is equal to the mortal wounds caused. I read that as something that inflicts d3 mortal wounds would be reduced by one since it is a single source
Click to expand...
What page in the core rules covers this?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top