• The forum software have been upgraded to the latest version.

    If you notice anything that looks off, or does not work, please let us know.

    For more information, click here.

AoS What has been your experience with Saurus only lists in AoS 2

You are not wrong. I will say that any unit which requires that they be under estimated is a bad unit in my opinion.

There is a difference between a bad unit in a tournament enviroment and a bad one even in casual games.

That said, saurus warriors are actually underestimated, so it's time to take some opponent by surprise.
 
There is a difference between a bad unit in a tournament enviroment and a bad one even in casual games.

That said, saurus warriors are actually underestimated, so it's time to take some opponent by surprise.
I love Fangs of Sotek.
 
I've found that you can still blow the command points and then flub the charge (even with the reroll 1 or reroll charge command ability). Every time I try to make the saurus knight bomb work, it severely disappoints me. There's just so many points of failure, I've found it to be very frustrating.
I think that's the biggest issue. There's so many ways in which a saurus list can fail completly it's kind of hilarious…
 
I love Fangs of Sotek.

Agreed, and there's actually some history in Sunclaw lists doing well. I believe one took 4th at the london GT (for whatever that means). Slann, carno, sunblood, priest, 40/40/10 warriors and 20 skinks i believe was the list. There was a thread that popped up shortly afterwards that discussed it in more detail.

From what I heard it played the objective game very well.
 
Back
Top