Salamander
Lord Tsunami
Member
- Messages
- 829
- Likes Received
- 29
- Trophy Points
- 18
The skavenpelt banner will not only cost you a whole bunch of points, for the hero carrying it and the banner itself, but it has another drawback that is probably much worse. it has to be carried by a skink, which in turn means it has to be carried by the BSB, and that means your BSB has to be a skink. We are blessed with two awesome options for BSBs, in Slann or Scar vets, because by comparison with other teams, they are very VERY hard to kill. The scar vet has good armour and T5, and the slann can be hidden away from harm inside a unit of TG. When you want to play the skavenpelt banner you give up having it on a really good character, and instead put your important BSB function with what may be the single worst character in the game. GOBLINS ARE BETTER, because they have T4 at least, not to mention that they cost half the points. You put your precious battle standard on a character that may as well be made from twigs and spit 
So, if you make this huge sacrifice you want something in return, right? If you put it in a unit of TG (lets assume 6 guys wide) you gain 6 WS4 S5 attacks. If you put it with normal sauruses you gain 6 WS3 S4 attacks, for the exact same investment. not a good option, right? The only case where i would even marginally consider using this would be in a unit of Cold ones, since that would give you ~6 WS4 S5 attacks (assuming charge) PLUS ~6 WS3 S4 attacks from the mounts (whether skavenpelt would affect the mounts has been debated, but i have never seen any argument that convinces me it doesnt). This ofc has the problem that you would have to use cold one cavalry, a unit that is of questionable worth at best. So, though it is fun with frenzy, i for one wouldnt want to make the huge sacrifices it requires.
So, if you make this huge sacrifice you want something in return, right? If you put it in a unit of TG (lets assume 6 guys wide) you gain 6 WS4 S5 attacks. If you put it with normal sauruses you gain 6 WS3 S4 attacks, for the exact same investment. not a good option, right? The only case where i would even marginally consider using this would be in a unit of Cold ones, since that would give you ~6 WS4 S5 attacks (assuming charge) PLUS ~6 WS3 S4 attacks from the mounts (whether skavenpelt would affect the mounts has been debated, but i have never seen any argument that convinces me it doesnt). This ofc has the problem that you would have to use cold one cavalry, a unit that is of questionable worth at best. So, though it is fun with frenzy, i for one wouldnt want to make the huge sacrifices it requires.