AoS Seraphon 2000 competitve

[Tizianolol]

Hi all, i m back!! I got some matches in italy in my GW.. I wanna test something different..What do u think?



Old Blood on Carnosaur 320( artifact 1)

skink priest 100 ( artifact 5)

scar vet on cold blood 100 (command ability 6, artifact 6)

6 ripperdactyl 280

10 saurus knights 240 ( battleline)

2x5 saurus knights 120 ( battleline)

2x5 chameleon 240

bastilodont 300

firelance starhost 60

shadowstrike starhost 120

 

[Crowsfoot]

A fast list but a fragile list, hit or die sort of list.

 

[Archkyrie11]

I've down a slightly different version of this list. Like @Crowsfoot said, very fast and fragile, but can do a lot of damage but your position needs to be pretty spot on to make this work. I ran it with 3x5 Knights and 3 Rippers so I could get some skinks in there as chaff to help the knights not get counter charged.

 

[Tizianolol]

Ye ira fragile guys, i posted in this forum my main list , my only problem is how to hold points..idk if knights and chameleon apre enought!! In thinking about 2x5 kroxi but they apre expensive and idk what remove!! Any1 play seraphon competitive?

 

[Archkyrie11]

Kroxigor are 3 for 180 and are actually pretty good, little bit better if you have some skinks around to babysit them.

If you want to use Krox you could drop you 10 knights to 5 and The Rippers to 3 that gives you 260 points to work with which you could fill with 3 Krox and a unit of Skinks.

 

[Tizianolol]

Yet he problem is dropping ripp and knight my 2 big unit became underpowered, my idea was 10 knights+ formation, carnosaur oldblood , and ripp formation to assault supported by chameleons 2x5 and bastilodont. 2x5 Knights to hold points with chameleon. The problem is that this list is not good in defense . Prob the solution is testing that. The key is if firelance formation worth or not

 

[Archkyrie11]

Yet he problem is dropping ripp and knight my 2 big unit became underpowered, my idea was 10 knights+ formation, carnosaur oldblood , and ripp formation to assault supported by chameleons 2x5 and bastilodont. 2x5 Knights to hold points with chameleon. The problem is that this list is not good in defense . Prob the solution is testing that. The key is if firelance formation worth or not

Firelance is fine, its just not being used as what its intended to. Knights aren't going to be able to stand around and tank things, they need to run around, hit troops, fall back and charge again, which is why the smaller units are ok to run with them. Rippers, yea 6 are cool and real strong but if I need the points 3 are acceptable, especially if you are dropping the Chamos nearby to help out the assassination. It depends what you want to do and how you want to run your army, if you want something defensive the Firelance is not the way to go.

 

[Tizianolol]

Your idea is interesting..3 ripper -10 skins-3 kroxi..is it enought is i have to def 2 points? I mean in 2 place of power ..what units can i use for it?

 

[Archkyrie11]

Your idea is interesting..3 ripper -10 skins-3 kroxi..is it enought is i have to def 2 points? I mean in 2 place of power ..what units can i use for it?

I just don't play that one

But you have enough heroes that you'd be fine in Places of Power, especially if you can hero snipe with Shadowstrike, they can't win if you kill their heroes

 

[Tizianolol]

Il thinking about a new list..maybe more solid:

Old blood carnosaur 320
-Command ability 5, artifact 3

Skink starpriest 100

Sunblood saurus 120
-Artifact 3

3 ripperdactyl 140

2x5 chameleon skins 240

Shadowstrike starhost 120

Bastilodont 300

2x10 skins 160

10 kroxigor 360

5 saurus knights 120

Tot 1980

Another idea is 3 rippers more and 5 chameleons less, with 1 unit of skinks part of shadowstrike..what do u prefer guys?
- a question.. Can i use same artifact for 2 heros?