Skink Chief
ravagekitteh
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,577
- Likes Received
- 2,880
- Trophy Points
- 113
Given the sheer size of some of my responses in the Random Thread of Randomness, and the likelihood of this provoking more and derailing it, I figured it is probably best if I stuck my reply and we continued continued here and the Random Thread of Randomness return to its original purpose (and we don’t subject its denizens to another tedious discussion about politics! 
) . So far we seem to have managed to stay fairly civil and not get particularly angry with each other in this particular subject, so here’s hoping we can keep it as this civilised discussion rather than the argument it frequently devolves to! 
Anyways:
There are numerous other examples as well, and I think the idea that the inclusion of “woke” concepts automatically ruins a piece of media is a terrible one. If anything, it should broadly be encouraged as the values it promotes are pretty much all positive. I know you have an issue with feminism, but even that, when done right and not how the few vocal “man hating” nutters sometimes makes it appear is still a positive message to display. At the end of the day, while many trolls and misogynists would have you believe it’s about empowerment of women over men and a few vocal but non-representative “feminist” nutters don’t exactly help in that regard, feminism is still ultimately about achieving equality between the sexes, and while things are set up in most countries so it should theoretically already be in place, in practice it’s not hard to see how it’s not (perhaps on a more societal basis rather than law) and there is still work to be done to rectify it. In any case though, I’m getting a bit off topic.
My point is, the presence of “woke” stuff doesn’t in itself make a work bad, or indeed make the work anything other than slightly more representative of the modern day. The only time it really can be a problem, and to be fair I think this is what you were trying to get at in the line I quoted, is when the film or whatever is built around “being woke”. Even that isn’t a guarantee to be bad - it’s entirely possible to create a great film based around a “woke” concept (e.g. a sensitive and thoughtful film on what it is like to be transgender in the modern day) but if the film isn’t like that then I agree it can be detrimental. Even when it is though, it isn’t the fault of the “woke” ideas themselves; it’s instead in the way they are handled and in the writing as whole. Because if your major selling point is that a film is “woke” and not anything else, then chances are the film doesn’t have much to offer and the writing likely isn’t that good (or at least it’s not unreasonable to assume that). The same goes for if a film’s “woke” message is delivered very hamfistedly or not handled well and ending in the right morals. Neither are the fault of the message; with the former, any moral is going to feel forced and overdone if the delivery is butchered, no matter what it’s preaching and with the latter, if you don’t have a clue how to deal with “woke” concepts you should probably stay the hell away from using them, or at least don’t make them pivotal to the plot.
Overall then, whilst I agree that when handled badly “woke” aspects can be problematic, I would strongly argue that it isn’t the “wokeness” itself that makes these things bad, and complaining about it being “woke” in itself instead of criticising the poor writing or handling of it is purely problematic. If it continues, it may well result in communities such as the LGBTQTS one and others having no representation whatsoever again, which is something nobody wants. The same goes for the inverse of course - if the trend of “it’s woke, it must be good and if you don’t like it, you’re an evil commie nazi etc” carries on, the natural conclusion is a torrent of terrible films that the only thing going for them is “wokeness” and anyone disagreeing being labelled a racist, and that most certainly isn’t good either. I will freely admit there are certain idiots on the left side of the spectrum that do this, the Tweeter in your other video being a good example (although interestingly enough I did a bit of Twitter trawling and couldn’t find anyone else that really had the same view as him), and although I think it’s slightly more forgivable than the right wing nutters “raging against ‘the gays’ being shown on the telly” (which is the logical extreme of hating “wokeness” and absolutely not something I’m accusing any of the members of the forum of doing, to be clear) it still isn’t exactly ideal.
I think the right answer is somewhere in the middle - gently encourage the positive things “wokeness” promotes to be delivered in a skilful and thoughtful way, or else not making a big deal of them (because frankly, the fact someone is gay or transgender or whatever shouldn’t be something we make a big deal of anyway; we should just accept it), and not hate on things just because they promote “woke” concepts or blindly adore them for it for the same reason.
In any case though, I think this horrendous wall of text is probably enough, so I forgive you if you don’t feel like stomaching it all in one go!
) . So far we seem to have managed to stay fairly civil and not get particularly angry with each other in this particular subject, so here’s hoping we can keep it as this civilised discussion rather than the argument it frequently devolves to! Anyways:
I think you may have a point there. I think @Killer Angel probably hit the nail on the head with how the movie will turn out, but the fact remains that enough people that are averse to that kind of thing has labelled it as “woke” and are now determined to boycott it and insist it’s terrible no matter how it turns out. The performance of it probably won’t do too badly; the average cinema goer in all likelihood doesn’t give a stuff about that sort of thing; but the effect of the minority combined with the fact it looks to be a fairly middling film overall will probably mean it will at least perform badly compared to some of the others.
I think I have to disagree with you there. Assuming that by “wokeness” you are referring to things like female empowerment and LGBTQTS people being featured, there is nothing about “wokeness” that ruins a story at all. To give an example you might be interested in, possibly the single most well received piece of Transformers media of all time is the comic Transformers More Than Meets the Eye (later Transformers Lost Light). It contains many features I think you would consider “woke” - there’s gay marriage and transgender characters and such, but the concepts themselves never play a major part in the story or at least not in a “look at how woke I am” “in your face” kind of way. Instead they’re dealt with in a sensitive and well thought out way, and the series as a whole is exceptionally well written and engaging. And it shows - it’s drawn in a near universal set of praise, not just from us “young SJW types” but from the entire fandom and beyond; the whole comics industry has showered upon it countless of (well earned) awards. If you can get hold of it, I would thoroughly recommend it to anyone - if anyone has Kindle Unlimited, the first couple are free on there.
There are numerous other examples as well, and I think the idea that the inclusion of “woke” concepts automatically ruins a piece of media is a terrible one. If anything, it should broadly be encouraged as the values it promotes are pretty much all positive. I know you have an issue with feminism, but even that, when done right and not how the few vocal “man hating” nutters sometimes makes it appear is still a positive message to display. At the end of the day, while many trolls and misogynists would have you believe it’s about empowerment of women over men and a few vocal but non-representative “feminist” nutters don’t exactly help in that regard, feminism is still ultimately about achieving equality between the sexes, and while things are set up in most countries so it should theoretically already be in place, in practice it’s not hard to see how it’s not (perhaps on a more societal basis rather than law) and there is still work to be done to rectify it. In any case though, I’m getting a bit off topic.
My point is, the presence of “woke” stuff doesn’t in itself make a work bad, or indeed make the work anything other than slightly more representative of the modern day. The only time it really can be a problem, and to be fair I think this is what you were trying to get at in the line I quoted, is when the film or whatever is built around “being woke”. Even that isn’t a guarantee to be bad - it’s entirely possible to create a great film based around a “woke” concept (e.g. a sensitive and thoughtful film on what it is like to be transgender in the modern day) but if the film isn’t like that then I agree it can be detrimental. Even when it is though, it isn’t the fault of the “woke” ideas themselves; it’s instead in the way they are handled and in the writing as whole. Because if your major selling point is that a film is “woke” and not anything else, then chances are the film doesn’t have much to offer and the writing likely isn’t that good (or at least it’s not unreasonable to assume that). The same goes for if a film’s “woke” message is delivered very hamfistedly or not handled well and ending in the right morals. Neither are the fault of the message; with the former, any moral is going to feel forced and overdone if the delivery is butchered, no matter what it’s preaching and with the latter, if you don’t have a clue how to deal with “woke” concepts you should probably stay the hell away from using them, or at least don’t make them pivotal to the plot.
Overall then, whilst I agree that when handled badly “woke” aspects can be problematic, I would strongly argue that it isn’t the “wokeness” itself that makes these things bad, and complaining about it being “woke” in itself instead of criticising the poor writing or handling of it is purely problematic. If it continues, it may well result in communities such as the LGBTQTS one and others having no representation whatsoever again, which is something nobody wants. The same goes for the inverse of course - if the trend of “it’s woke, it must be good and if you don’t like it, you’re an evil commie nazi etc” carries on, the natural conclusion is a torrent of terrible films that the only thing going for them is “wokeness” and anyone disagreeing being labelled a racist, and that most certainly isn’t good either. I will freely admit there are certain idiots on the left side of the spectrum that do this, the Tweeter in your other video being a good example (although interestingly enough I did a bit of Twitter trawling and couldn’t find anyone else that really had the same view as him), and although I think it’s slightly more forgivable than the right wing nutters “raging against ‘the gays’ being shown on the telly” (which is the logical extreme of hating “wokeness” and absolutely not something I’m accusing any of the members of the forum of doing, to be clear) it still isn’t exactly ideal.
I think the right answer is somewhere in the middle - gently encourage the positive things “wokeness” promotes to be delivered in a skilful and thoughtful way, or else not making a big deal of them (because frankly, the fact someone is gay or transgender or whatever shouldn’t be something we make a big deal of anyway; we should just accept it), and not hate on things just because they promote “woke” concepts or blindly adore them for it for the same reason.
In any case though, I think this horrendous wall of text is probably enough, so I forgive you if you don’t feel like stomaching it all in one go!
Last edited:
.
