YouTube dilly dilly. Fun set of commercials.Unfortunately that joke is lost to many of us, most Europeans wouldn't even touch Bud Light so there are no commercials for it here.
literally the only thing I know about Bud Light is that it's american and apparently utterly horrible.Unfortunately that joke is lost to many of us, most Europeans wouldn't even touch Bud Light so there are no commercials for it here.
It is pish-water honestly. Bud light and even regular bud. It has extremely low AbV and is cheap as chips
"Pew Pew"
Sure!Someone could say that quantity has a quality of its own...
you're one to talk there...
As of late, I have been far from the worst offender!
You're set to pass @Arli pretty soon!...and exactly when I've finally catched @spawning of Bob , i must face the soon-to-come surpass by @Lord-Marcus , that posts at ludicrous speed...
I have you now! *Pew pew*...and exactly when I've finally catched @spawning of Bob , i must face the soon-to-come surpass by @Lord-Marcus , that posts at ludicrous speed...
Not a spambot.The spambot has arrived.
I'm not spamming.Come now, since making your proclamations at desiring to reach Slannhood, your posting style has changed drastically. Spam posts, 2, 3, 4 or even 5 consecutive posts made minutes or seconds apart.
If you are referring to my Just for Laughs, check the time stamp between posts. Outside of a very few exceptions you will find significant elapsed time between the "1 photo per post" system you describe.
Timing and intent are the critical elements here. Timing is quantifiable and recorded. Intent is pretty obvious as per my first point in this post.
There is a very big difference. Aside from forum clutter, spam posts don't particularly hurt anyone, but let's call a spade a spade.
This ↑
I was mimicking the sound of a tie fighters blasters because I know you like star wars.The "issue" (and I use that term lightly) is not with you posting photos or the quality of your photos, but rather the method by which you post them. When you post 5 pictures in 5 separate posts within a thread all in the span of less than 5 minutes... that is spamming.
Also, of late you reply to several different posts (within a single thread) in multiple posts (once again mere minutes apart); as opposed to multi-quoting in a single post. I'm not saying that it hasn't happened naturally to just about everyone one of us from time to time. But timing and frequency hint at more "nefarious" (once again used lightly) plot.
More evidence of spamming:
This ↑
Maybe that was a little harsh on my part, I was just trying to keep things on topic. After several failed attempts I was a bit frustrated.
That is NOT my desired goal in the slightest. As I mentioned in our other parallel discussion, I think you are an awesome member of the community. I think we all enjoy your posts... just perhaps more neatly wrapped/organized.
